Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Gotta love a good "prominent negative excursion". Which is to say, gotta love unabashed scientific writing. "Neutral bouyancy" would be another good one. We need better basic science writing, even if it is on the quagmire that is wikipedia.


And by "quagmire" I mean...

> We know the entire exogenic carbon cycle ... underwent a −0.2 % to −0.3 % perturbation in δ13C ...

[citation needed] much? And yet, wikipedia is not standardized nor enforced for such things. Sorry for the digression.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: