> Basically none of the functions, macros or syntax is from Lisp.

Sounds like it's extremely well named, then. LispyScript is to Lisp as Javascript is to Java: an entirely different language with different syntax, semantics, standard library and performance characteristics, but with just enough superficial similarity to provide plausible deniability for the name.

Well said! ;-)

This is why I called my version of this "Loosp", because it required a very loose (so probably incorrect) definition of Lisp to call it a Lisp: https://github.com/capnmidnight/betty-boop/blob/master/pong....