Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't think this relates to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation, I think it's just meant to represent the evolution of Google Go as a language.


That's interesting, I thought it was a direct (joke) response to the "Go" vs "Go!" situation. The "Go!" author stated that his language came first and then we find these conveniently aged commits the following day.

Either way, it's nice to see Google not taking itself too seriously.


Finding a commit on one day doesn't mean the commit happened on that day.


I could be completely wrong of course, and the timing is convenient. I guess it depends on when these changes were pushed in, but then it's hard to tell when a possibly fake timestamp was made...


Possibly fake?


Yeah, that really didn't need to be added...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: