Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"We are not naïve, we knew it was coming," Rubin tells Fast Company. "We thought that we would at least get a week notice—a fair game"

He knew it was coming, he knew it was wrong. Why would he need more warning than two hours? Why even a warning?



Nothing indicates that he knew it was "wrong", only that Twitter won't like it.


Among many problems: when applications exploit Twitter metadata to send unwanted unsolicited messages, that makes users far less willing to authenticate other apps to Twitter. I'm already paranoid about doing that (and Facebook authentication), because who knows how the app will choose to embarrass me?


Yet somehow I think promising not to spam again would not provide a path towards regaining access, post Periscope.


The bigger issue is that if there was no punishment, everyone else would now be trying to use the same tactics Meerkat did in order to spam people and obtain growth, which does result in a negative Twitter experience in the long run.

Startups will probably still try to do it anyways, though.


potato potato


You were also upvoted.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: