Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

1. Why not? Dropbox has decided to include a member of the torture program in their organization. It's an implicit admittance that she doesn't belong in prison.

2. Irrelevant, none of us are in a diplomatic post here but we're still all being spied on via any avenue by the NSA- dropbox being a confirmed avenue for this purpose.

3. I don't think you'll find too many people agreeing with you here. After all, it was the US and a few minor cronies (Poland, Georgia) going in alone, with the majority of our allies and all of the rest of the world saying we were making a huge mistake-- a mistake which has haunted us ever since, and caused many of our allies to turn away from us and seek more autonomy. "Doing a stellar job" at torturing people and knocking over governments is not a positive thing to say about someone.



Dropbox isn't the court system, nor should it be. It isn't their job to decide who should or shouldn't be in jail.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: