The evidence presented is IQ scores from 1932. Given historical gender biases this not persuasive. Culling scientific evidence from conservative think tank Op-Eds is probably not a best practice...
Maybe most notable is a 1995 paper in Science http://www.sciencemag.org/content/269/5220/41 but it is both behind a paywall and completely devoid of figures! You get the main idea from the abstract, though: Except in tests of reading comprehension, perceptual speed, and associative memory, males typically outnumber females substantially among high-scoring individuals.
While there may be gender differences among high/low scoring individuals, I resent that that this is treated as a scientific fact when there are limited studies with contradictory findings.
It comes out in a wide variety of measures. Simple ones that people are familiar with are things like Gini coefficients of income among males is more distributed, IQ is more distributed, various incarceration statistics etc.
So while the richest people might be men, the poorest population will also be men.
Or, the people with highest and lowest IQs will be men.
source?