Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can anyone think of a peace-time disaster at sea that was not as a result of human error? Titanic? Exxon Valdez? Costa Concordia? The 'humans are critical for safety' argument is flawed when we don't know how well robot ships will do.

Sail augmented with solar needs to make a comeback before we run out of oil, it would be cool if ships just found there own way around the globe, safely crew-less.



I don't know anything about the maritime world, but playing Devil's Advocate you're suffering from selection bias: you're naming instances where humans caused the errors but not factoring in the unreported instances of humans saving the cargo, the ship, the personnel or all three.


MS München 1978, large freighter lost to a rouge wave.

SS Edmund Fitzgerald 1975, large freighter lost in a storm

Tamponas II 1981, Passenger ship sinks due to fire, 580 die

Mechanical failure, fire, and weather take many of them. Just a few that come to mind above, but you can read the list too. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_maritime_disasters


I think this is a really good point, but it is also necessary to think about software caused errors. It only takes one error to make a disaster!




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: