Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe the messaging is a little off here?

So we have what happened.

How about this scenario instead? An announcement that due to all the serious issues in technology affecting startups, YC is going to donate its facilities to both political parties to hold fundraisers and get to know the people their policies are influencing. The first one is upcoming on yadda yadda yadda Then add some small print about how one of the corporate officers has to endorse any proposed event.*

Then you can all get together and give money to one bunch, never let the other bunch show up, and still get to look like heroes. Instead, we get this brouhaha.

Doesn't look too optimal from a PR standpoint.

*Note that this would only work for one or two election cycles until the gig was up. But still, it'd look a heckuva lot better than what we have now.



Did you misread his comment, or was there some tricky subtext there? In this upcoming cycle, Sam supports the Democratic party. Suggesting that he support both parties to avoid some kind of PR problem is flat-out creepy. He's got the same right to support parties and policy agendas as you or I have.


I was providing advice as to how YC the company might have interests that are separate from his. Or not.

Guess it's his call.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: