Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This particular standard feature has been a huge selling point for Cirrus, makers of a very nice, very expensive, high performance aircraft that has been heavily marketed toward wealthy, low time pilots that in many instances have no business being at the controls of such a challenging airplane. There is an argument to be made that this feature has created overconfident pilots that use the chute as an excuse for making otherwise poor or dangerous go/no-go decisions in the face of weather, terrain, etc. Cirrus' accident rate has been higher than the average for comparable aircraft, and it probably doesn't help that they used the chute as an excuse to skip proper spin testing of the aircraft.


> marketed toward wealthy ... pilots

Should they be targeting the poor ones with their "very expensive" aircraft?

> low time pilots

Can you provide ANY evidence that Cirrus targets "low time pilots?" Of course, the customer's insurance company has some say in this, too.

> There is an argument to be made that this feature has created overconfident pilots ...

Sure, but, again, where's your evidence?

> it probably doesn't help that they used the chute as an excuse to skip proper spin testing of the aircraft.

??? The SR20 was spun 60 times, with 60 recoveries, as part of European certification: https://www.cirruspilots.org/copa/safety_programs/m/copa_saf...!


The issue is that Cirrus is marketed as a personal transportation vehicle to people who aren't already pilots.

If you look at the accidents, there are quite a few head-scratchers (pilot gets lost and deploys BRS, or pilot gets disoriented in IMC and deploys BRS). It's not just one or two, but quite a lot like this. The Cirrus seems to be the new doctor killer.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: