Not only does it add nothing to the original (amazing) content, but what it does try to add is kind of a mess: the "cue" of C? Try to catch her "sleight" against copyright?
EDIT to add: I wouldn't call any article that summarizes or comments on other content "blogspam", although this one probably qualifies. It would seem to depend on whether the commentary actually adds anything. Also, HN's guidelines recommend doing this kind of thing if one wants to include some commentary with a link.
EDIT to add: I wouldn't call any article that summarizes or comments on other content "blogspam", although this one probably qualifies. It would seem to depend on whether the commentary actually adds anything. Also, HN's guidelines recommend doing this kind of thing if one wants to include some commentary with a link.