Isn't that usually what people do in developments? They obtain a copy or fork of a library, and only update it at their discretion? This seems like an oversight by the developers rather than Go.
I realise that since Go supports this, it is encouraging to simply do that, but it isn't wise in the long term.
For instance, I've had some issues with Go-SDL, because one of the forks became unreliable. I decided eventually to simply fork another of the forks myself to overcome all these issues, and simply update my fork with commits to the main project whenever they came around.
I realise that since Go supports this, it is encouraging to simply do that, but it isn't wise in the long term.
For instance, I've had some issues with Go-SDL, because one of the forks became unreliable. I decided eventually to simply fork another of the forks myself to overcome all these issues, and simply update my fork with commits to the main project whenever they came around.