> The mac was probably the closest equivalent, it came out the year prior had more memory and a built in screen but cost more than twice as much.
I remember the Mac emulator running Mac software faster than a classic Mac. Too bad the drive was not compatible so you had to convert disks for them to be readable.
I remember the Mac emulator running Mac software faster than a classic Mac. Too bad the drive was not compatible so you had to convert disks for them to be readable.