Part of it did!
> Was it not the most extensive library of human writing at that time?
No.
More importantly, the original assertion:
> the world certainly turned its back on the only collection of written knowledge and let it turn to ash
is definitely not true.
Part of it did!
> Was it not the most extensive library of human writing at that time?
No.
More importantly, the original assertion:
> the world certainly turned its back on the only collection of written knowledge and let it turn to ash
is definitely not true.