"Some agencies" covertly installing equipment at, what, 3 companies (at most) out of the millions in the country is categorically different than overt and widespread installation of party members into high-ranking roles in hundreds/thousands of companies.
Claiming that these are remotely comparable is either pure ignorance or blatant propaganda. Any sane person can see that these aren't in the same universe of things.
Yeah, that link isn't relevant to anything. You're just throwing out random garbage because your argument is invalid and you know it.
You're a propagandist.
Fortunately, the vast majority of people that I've talked to don't fall for this line of fallacy - I'm just making sure your lies don't fool those that happen to overlook them.
> means one has chosen to be part of the despotism problem
Yeah, this is unhinged. You need to up your propaganda training and/or change the LLM you're using to generate comments - this generally discredits your account extremely quickly.
One has a right to believe whatever they like, but most people already know the "Detect, Deny, Degrade, Disrupt, Destroy, Deceive" rhetoric you are spouting.
I for one praise our glorious leader. Have a wonderful day. =3
> One has a right to believe whatever they like, but most people already know the "Detect, Deny, Degrade, Disrupt, Destroy, Deceive" rhetoric you are spouting.
With every clinically insane statement you make, you're just continuing to undermine the positions you're trying to fallaciously support. You know that, right? The average HN reader is pretty smart. They can see that statements like
> ad hominem rhetoric means one has chosen to be part of the despotism problem
...are not made by individuals who are both sane and honest (i.e. not sane propagandists).
I know I can't convince you of anything - these rebuttals are just to expose how hollow this pro-CCP propaganda is to other readers on HN. And every unhinged message just brings your position further into the disinfecting sunlight of reason.
An LLM spamming users is against YC site usage policy. Note it is very common for congress members to end up at large firms. Have a great day, and maybe a walk outside will cheer you up more than gas-lighting people. =3
Yes, which is why you're likely the one breaking HN's policy. I'm actually making coherent points. Your messages are as incoherent and nonsensical as primitive text-generation models - very characteristic of LLMs, that can't actually use logic correctly, and just...make up stuff.
Yet another self-discrediting post for all HN to see. By all means, continue.
One is free to send a FOIA request for oversight activities by ODNI regarding embedded agent activities within corporations, and a detailed explanation of why these folks activity is usually protected by law.
Inferring these folks don’t matter is delusional propaganda. Yawn... Good bye. =3
Wow, the LLM actually went in a loop! I can copy-paste my response almost unmodified from the top of the thread:
Installation of embedded agents into a handful of companies (at most) out of the millions in the country is categorically different than overt and widespread installation of party members into high-ranking roles in hundreds/thousands of companies.
Claiming that these are remotely comparable is either pure ignorance or blatant propaganda. Any sane person can see that these aren't in the same universe of things.
Let me know when you're out of your loop (this is the third time your LLM has responded with "Have a great day" or "good bye" without stopping) and actually read the comments you're replying to and turn on your brain to reply.
Or don't - if anyone in the future comes to read this thread, your comments will completely destroy any shred of inclination they might have to believing your points.
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Can you expand on instances where the US government has installed overseers in large US companies? This sounds preposterous.