Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

GitLab is the solution, if you aren't on it already.

I worked for one of Australia largest airline company, monthly meeting with Github team resumed in one word: AI

There is zero focus into the actual platform as we knew it, it is all AI, Copilot, more AI and more Copilot.

If you are expecting things to get better, I have bad news for you. Copilot is not being adopted by companies as they hoped, they are using Claude themselves. If Microsoft ever rollback, boy oh boy, things will get ugly.





GitLab is no improvement over github, their features are frequently half-baked, their site is slow, and outages are just as common.

I used to like Gitlab, and I've self-hosted enterprise versions of both github and gitlab, and strongly believe migration from one of them to the other for "improved reliability" will be utterly underwhelming and pointless.

Gitlab used to be able to take the high-ground due to the open-core model, but these days I'm not even sure if that makes an appreciable difference.


This pretty much, and it's also more expensive.

Do they have their own model? I thought Copilot was a frontend for Clause et. al..

To the best of my knowledge, Copilot is a Microsof in-house thing and it sucks on everything. Claude is far superior and Microsoft is allegedly using Claude internally over its own AI solution.

Github Copilot is just a front-end. You pay for the frontend and some premium requests every month.

The base models like GPT 4o, 4.1 don’t have a usage cap. Models like Claude Sonet, Opus, etc have a monthly limit and you can pay more to use these through Github Copilot.


>Github Copilot is just a front-end

Yes, Copilot is often used to refer to both frontend and backend.

Also, the chatbot aka Copilot must have features on its own. Like I say to Roo Code/Cline on VSCode: Write a python script to output hello world.

And they will do exactly that, Roo Code is pretty impressive. Copilot on its own is dogshit and when using it the same way I would use Perplexity AI or ChatGPT, it is twice as much dogshit.


To be honest all the GitLab dev focus is also AI.

* Originally it was Dev (issues)

* Then it was DevOps (runners)

* Then it was DevSecOps (SAST)

* Now it's AI DevSecOps (reviews, etc)

The problem is that each feature has been slightly more half-baked than the last one. The SecOps stuff is full of gotchas which don't exist. Troubleshooting a pipeline behaving correctly is extremely painful.

The other problem is that if you want a feature you have to upgrade the seat license for everyone :(


End users are being screwed over left and right, you better host your own code. GitHub, GitLab only adds a GUI for git.

Enterprise helm will pay if that means no interruption, no AI being pushed everywhere. Some companies adopt GitLab because you can self host it, even the runners are self-hosted, there is no built-in runner like GitHub.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: