Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Why my "metric-free" social network failed and became a toxic void
2 points by mekod 5 months ago | hide | past | favorite | 3 comments
I recently saw a viral video listing "startup ideas that don't exist," and one was a social media platform without metrics (no likes, no followers, no counts) to fix social anxiety.

I’ve actually built this before. I had the same hypothesis: if we remove the dopamine-chasing metrics, people will engage in pure, meaningful conversation.

I was wrong. Here is what happened:

The 4chan Effect: Without the "social guardrails" that metrics provide (even if they are toxic), people didn't become more thoughtful; they became more chaotic. Without a sense of "reputation" or "public standing," the content quickly devolved into nonsense and 4chan-style toxicity.

The Vacuum of Value: Users didn't know what was "good." In a world with no metrics, everything has the same weight. It turns out humans need some form of social proof to navigate information.

The Engagement Paradox: People complain about metrics, but they don't know how to interact without them. Content creators stopped posting because there was no feedback loop.

The project is now forgotten and dead. I realized that you can't just remove the "bad" parts of human nature by deleting a few lines of code (like 'likes' or 'shares'). You just create a vacuum that gets filled by something worse.

Has anyone else tried building "calm tech" and faced this "reputation-free" chaos?



One thing I didn’t anticipate is how removing explicit feedback also removes accountability. Without visible response, people don’t just post freely, they post carelessly.:) I’m now convinced “no metrics” isn’t enough; you need alternative feedback primitives that guide behavior without turning into dopamine counters.


I expected something like this to be fill by more spam than toxicity. Where the pages invisible without login?


There was no login option in the app, and I was expecting spam. By toxic content, I mean meaningless and empty. There were at least 200 people from the Hacker News community, and hundreds more were sharing content. Even these people didn't try to leave a meaningful mark, which was unexpected. And regarding spam, I was very afraid of it and took serious precautions on the backend, but I still didn't see any spam other than attempts to spoof the algorithm (by spoofing the algorithm, I mean a post could rank higher based on its freshness, depending on how many clicks and shares it received).




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: