> Only one could do it.
If I understood the chart correctly, even the successful one only found 1/6 of the creatures across multiple runs.
Without comparison to some null hypothesis (a random policy), this article is hogwash.
For some problems, randomness outperforms incompetent reasoning
> Only one could do it.
If I understood the chart correctly, even the successful one only found 1/6 of the creatures across multiple runs.