>AI might replace tech writers (just like it might replace anyone), but it won't be a GOOD replacement.
That's fine, though: as long as the AI's output is better than "completely and utterly useless", or even "nonexistent", it'll be an improvement in many places.
That's fine, though: as long as the AI's output is better than "completely and utterly useless", or even "nonexistent", it'll be an improvement in many places.