You can't be serious, but the nature of the interference differs:
Russians allegedly posted things on twitter that may or may not have helped Trump.
Maduro allegedly just totally lied about the vote counts, did not actually win the election.
The first is at best "meh", the second is circumventing the electoral process completely.
> So factually proven Russian interference in the United States elections does not invalidate election
If you consider Russian interference in the US elections to be factually proven, then I suppose we can safely make that same assumption about the Venezuelan electoral fraud claims. I'd say the public evidence regarding those is even better than the evidence available related to the Russian electoral interference claims.
Russians allegedly posted things on twitter that may or may not have helped Trump.
Maduro allegedly just totally lied about the vote counts, did not actually win the election.
The first is at best "meh", the second is circumventing the electoral process completely.
> So factually proven Russian interference in the United States elections does not invalidate election
If you consider Russian interference in the US elections to be factually proven, then I suppose we can safely make that same assumption about the Venezuelan electoral fraud claims. I'd say the public evidence regarding those is even better than the evidence available related to the Russian electoral interference claims.