As other comments allude to, there are several factual weaknesses quickly obvious in contrast to the storyline of the article.
Another rather significant historical fact the author completely omits is that the iPhone generated crazy hype among consumer customers [0] and bored the business community.
I think it would still even be graceful to assume the opposite about AR "computing".
Constructing the premise of "this is a precursor of the next big thing" in light of this contrast is rather hard to follow.
Another rather significant historical fact the author completely omits is that the iPhone generated crazy hype among consumer customers [0] and bored the business community.
I think it would still even be graceful to assume the opposite about AR "computing".
Constructing the premise of "this is a precursor of the next big thing" in light of this contrast is rather hard to follow.
[0]: https://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/technology/circuits/27pog...