without a constitution that is the absolute definition of peoples rights and government power in an easily understood and brief document, you have nothing to govern, there is no law, just deciders, chosen in a popularity contest, each hopeing for a chance at dynastic power.
the current situation highlights exactly what you get with an "amended" constitution
the fundamental question is do we want a world where indivuals have very strong personal rights
to themselves and there property, or do we want to meddle, pick, and choose, deciding this way and that....since the answer is very, very , clearly
that most wish to meddle and decide about every little thing, then they can only complain about what they,have done, can do, will do again.
It is impossible to meddle ,choose and decide our way into a prosperous, sustainable, just, and happy civilisation.
pick a lane......
> It is impossible to meddle ,choose and decide our way into a prosperous, sustainable, just, and happy civilisation
Asserted without evidence.
> the answer is very, very , clearly that most wish to meddle and decide about every little thing
Asserted without evidence. Most people don't want to be involved in decision making at all - witness participation in civic institutions and groups. Most people simply want a working system which gives them the right amount and the right kinds of liberty (in all possible senses) and safety. They may choose to "meddle" when they perceive these goals as not being met.
