Not-exactly-devil's-advocate: you're trying to sort content by quality. That's elitist. Also, those those filtered contents are worth more. You can't have only premium contents.

Someone should do it anyway and make it dominant anyway ASAP.

> 3: use an LLM to censor all political speech.

And who gets to decide what is political? Are human rights political? Is a trans person merely existing political? Is calling for genocide political?

The LLM decides it. That's what the AI is for.

There is a lot of stuff on the Internet, so I think the AI can just censor 80% of it and we're still going to have enough to have a social media.

Really saying "please, let the robot run humanity", huh.

Let the robot run ONE SITE. You still have Twitter, Mastodon, Bluesky, Facebook, Reddit, etc., if you want a non-stop stream of political content on your feed.

LLMs are guessing machines, they don’t “decide” anything. It would be decided by the people programming it and putting in alignment guardrails.

Just use an LLM to verify only humans are on the social network and no bots and you win

computer: show me jingling keys

wonder if the LLM would censor this post

If it works the way I want it absolutely should. Mentioning politics is political content.

^-- This comment proves my point.