Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

App.net is not Twitter. It's an infrastructure, upon which new social services can bloom. It's AWS.


We have infrastructure. It's called AWS. The infrastructure of App.net is not revolutionary or even that interesting. Why do new social services need this infrastructure?


So that doesn't make sense. If I have a website running on AWS, do I have my users pay AWS for me?


I don't know if even the owners know what this shit is




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: