Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Let's talk about the article and then dark matter, I guess:

> We’ve always been taught that the fundamental constants of nature — like the speed of light or the charge of an electron — are unchanging. But what if they aren’t fixed after all?

I mean, sure, what if? Honestly, if you can vary things like gravity, I don't think you need any additional components to explain the dark matter observations.

> The CCC+TL model needs to provide testable predictions that can be confirmed or refuted through observations and experiments

This step is important!

Ok, so dark matter generally: this YouTuber [1](physicist/physics PhD) notes that there are many theories that explain the dark matter observations. But to her, "dark matter" is the data that we need to explain.

Essentially: we have a bunch of weird observations where it looks like there's way more matter than we see. But the actual explanation for what it is, there are tons of those. So throw one more in the pile (this one says "oh there's no extra matter, the universal constants are different over there and light maybe moves slower as it travels farther")

[1] https://youtu.be/qS34oV-jv_A?si=z2KcSSIhezXppNAc



The article confuses dark matter and dark energy. The theory in question relates to dark energy, not matter.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: