Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Reading this article, it seems to me that what the author thinks of when they say "D&D" is actually Forgotten Realms.

Which is why I massively prefer Eberron, as the original setting makes no sense at all.

Not that Eberron is without its faults but at least it's coherent and embraces what it is.

https://www.dndbeyond.com/posts/279-welcome-to-eberron-an-in...



I just finished posting a comment disagreeing with the author and I think you've nailed the problem with their argument more succinctly than I did. They're assuming "Forgotten Realms" and AD&D, not OD&D.


> the original setting

Forgotten Realms was not the original setting of D&D. To the extent there was one, it was Gygax's Greyhawk campaign.


TIL. I thought that Greyhawk and Dragonlance came after Forgotten Realms!


This Wikipedia article has a good timeline showing when the various D&D settings were first released:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dungeons_%26_Dragons_campaign_...

Note that Blackmoor and Greyhawk, at least, were used by their respective creators/DMs (Dave Arneson and Gary Gygax) for quite a few years before being published. I suspect that's true of at least some of the other settings as well (Forgotten Realms was Ed Greenwood's campaign world before it was published--it looks like it was a D&D campaign world more or less from the release of AD&D 1st Edition in 1978).


Note that Blackmoor existed as a game setting before D&D was ever published. Arguably it's where the role playing aspect of it came from, as Dave Arneson was heavily influenced by, and participated in, Braunstein games.


The author was specifically referring to the original 3 book rules, which pre-dated Forgotten Realms by 13 years.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: