For this whole conversation, you refused the claim I brought, and I never said it was the single reason, as wrong because there are other factors in.
The loss of heavy industry did play a role yes, but not investing in building plants for almost 2 decades also play a major role.
Every of your response are like this, I say something and you claim that I says it's the single reason.
From the beginning of this conversation you have been manipulative (like your 5th paragraph) in this discussion.
Your manipulation even present logic flaw, you blame that i reject everything on anti nuclear and covid, and 2 paragraph later, "You were totally unable to even conceive that some problems were not the result of some sort of anti-nuclear propaganda."
> Then explain me then.
The things I claim are a part of the whole problem, and I never said that something was the whole cause.
From the beginning when I pointed at A cause you said the cause was the symptom, or alternatively, you said another problem was THE cause.
I'm not the one saying most of the problems are due to the directions of EDF
From very early in the conversation I've said, quote, "Let's be clear: I'm not saying that your claims are fundamentally incorrect".
Since the beginning, I've been clear: it's just bullshit to pretend that the two reasons you brought would have changed any of the conclusion in this article.
That's totally crazy. You have an article, you say "naah, it's just because ..." and then when someone says "not really, it's mainly because ..." you say "yeah, in fact it's not really because of what I've said, but I never pretended it was the case".
Again, if you now agree that your two reasons are not changing much of the conclusion, then you were just hyper misleading and ishonest when attacking the article pretending they did not explain well because they forgot to say reasons that the whole industry, including report that you have brought, agrees are at best negligible on the situation. You could simply have said "I don't agree with the conclusion because it was due to EDF governance". But you didn't did you?
Thanks, now go away, let the adults deal with the situation and continue to think you are not the problem.
Every of your response are like this, I say something and you claim that I says it's the single reason.
From the beginning of this conversation you have been manipulative (like your 5th paragraph) in this discussion.
Your manipulation even present logic flaw, you blame that i reject everything on anti nuclear and covid, and 2 paragraph later, "You were totally unable to even conceive that some problems were not the result of some sort of anti-nuclear propaganda."
> Then explain me then.
The things I claim are a part of the whole problem, and I never said that something was the whole cause.
From the beginning when I pointed at A cause you said the cause was the symptom, or alternatively, you said another problem was THE cause.
I'm not the one saying most of the problems are due to the directions of EDF