To be fair, without evidence such name-calling would not be helpful. Not talking about a specific local chapter of a single charity and instead focusing on the problem in general seems to be more helpful in this context.
Exactly. And the national charity for this example does really good work in a lot of places. Like I said, I think it's just how the local chapter is organized.
It's a reasonable request. Readers who see the charity to be named named may also donate to them, and seeing such a claim would make readers think twice and perhaps make their donations elsewhere.
It’s not a request, it’s a rhetorical question with the same intent as the comment it’s responding to: signaling outrage.
Both are self-serving and harmful to the actual cause. Despite being on the same side of the issue, neither actually affect any change. Even worse, they both probably feel like they’ve done something to help by posting a comment on a social media site and are now less likely to take any real action
