Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Show HN: Netmaker – Netmaker Goes Open Source (github.com/gravitl)
85 points by Yebo_en_mesh on Sept 25, 2023 | hide | past | favorite | 10 comments


I’ve been running netmaker now for little over a year in conjunction with keycloak. This was back when tailscale didn’t have support for oicd SSO in their lower-tier offering. I’ve had some difficulty with upgrades and connectivity behind various NAT scenarios. One issue that I found difficult: If a client updated, it would not longer connect until the server side software was updated. This meant I had to exclude netclient from package upgrades. Overall, when it works, it works great. There have been some improvements. I would like to see networks statistics get included in their free/open source offering.


I struggled to get netmaker to work. Everything showed connected and green, yet nodes couldn’t ping each other. There is very little troubleshooting guides and I was stuck. The documentation is randomly outdated (I don’t think there is a single screenshot that matches the UI I was seeing) and the only tip I found on the website was to change the MTU which did nothing for me. The other tip on GitHub was “check your firewall” which I’m not sure what that means. I thought the entire point of netmaker was to bypass that.

Oh and I tried to signup for the cloud offering instead of self hosting it, and got a generic “Tenant failed setup” email. Again, no action to take…

I got headscale and Netbird to work, but I much preferred the latter. It just works.

Edit: to add, the default installer results in 2 broken containers in the generated docker compose file (coredns and TURN server) that I had to fix manually by changing their tags.


I used it about a year and a half ago and I had the same takeaway. When I got it working, it worked well and was reasonably stable. But I basically could not upgrade without performing a fresh install after a few months. I filed it away as something to revisit as the product matured and more guarantees around upgrades were able to be offered


Yeah, I’m definitely keeping an eye on it because I like the way it manages wireguard clients more, but it’s still pretty rough.



Open Core at best:

> All content that resides under the "pro/" directory of this repository, if that directory exists, is licensed under the license defined in "pro/LICENSE".


Discord for Support? That would require me to either use my personal discord for work, or make a work discord.


Sure. Do the latter.


Funny how they go from sspl which is a more "free" license to a less free license that is agpl in the name of "open source". Cool


They're moving to Apache, not AGPL?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: