Yes and both can be expressed in js and jq. Poinjt is what JS is known by much more peopel. As fx uses Node or Deno we for example can use lodash in fx:
fx '_.groupBy("commit.author.name")' '_.mapValues(size)'
'_.toPairs' '_.sortBy(1)' '_.reverse' '_.take(10)' '_.fromPairs'
To do if in jq, it will take me much more time and extensive documentation reading.
As someone who doesn't use jq, a number of questions immediately jump out at me. Why is the input string double qouted ('"input"')? What does the backslash annotate? At first it looks like an escape similar to regex, but the other bracket doesn't have it so it must mean something else? Etc. Of course I could look the answers up, but the point is I can't tell without looking it up. While the code is short it feels similar to Awk, if you know it it's trivial, if you don't know it it's hard to be sure what it does without trying it out.
jq seems shorter but I don't see how it's more intuitive - ".name" is pretty basic jq syntax but how do I know \() is syntax for wrapping selectors within strings? I've used jq for many years and tbh I've never done string templating with it, so I would need to go digging in the docs.
You can argue that's the case for any language, but it's the fundamental reason DSLs rarely capture the mainstream for on-the-fly utilities. Leveraging existing knowledge of a more heavily used syntax really helps here. Look at awk for example - it's been around forever, and despite its power and ubiquity in OS installs, you'll still see sed in many many more bash scripts because it's leaning on widely used familiar syntax rather than a DSL.
That said - the fx example has "x => Hello, ${x}!" where I would expect "x => `Hello, ${x}!`", so that does indicate to me that fx has its own gotchas lurking - this example could just be contrived to look intuitive.
