Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Worse than angry people living on the sidewalk and the margins of freeways?


Tight housing didn't solve that. In fact, everywhere there's a homeless camp happens to be right where there is tight housing. Because the corporations building your dream community of prison block housing is still charging a lot for it. It's not creating more housing for the poor. That's just what the developers' marketing agency told you. Housing shortages have nothing to do with land shortages. They have everything to do with banking and mental healthcare.


The angry people living on the sidewalk aren't there because parking lots are stopping them from building skyscrapers though


Depends on how affordable housing would be in those skyscrapers


If you have an engineering solution that can build skyscrapers on begging income, land prices aren't going to hold you back from being a billionaire...


I mean they would move in if prices got lower thanks to abundant housing


The closer the housing the more expensive. That's a stastistical fact that is very inconvenient for your bullshit.


Read up on supply and demand then welcome back to start making sense :)


Here is a simple write up from someone else, with links to some relevant research about the carbon footprint of high density housing. https://humantransit.org/2010/03/does-highdensity-life-have-...

Specifically for housing in America, though, more houses don't lower the price. That's because the more housing is owned by an individual builder the more they control appraisal comps. Why do you think they have so much marketing to try to convince you that it's good for the environment? They are able to get zoning exceptions to build high density, high priced living. Pick any skyscraper residence in America. Nearly all, if not all, are far more expensive than surrounding suburbs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: