It is completely devoid of any data - just assertions that are completely false in the world I live in.
> If your best interpretation of "innovation" is "web standards," it is clear that we have VERY different perspectives on modern computing.
Well, in HN the standard topic of "MS stalling" is IE, so I assumed that.
> Please consider the tone of your posting.
Yes, it was a bit aggressive. I've been on HN since the time when a demand for facts or at the very least items that could be discussed (rather than vague notions) was the norm. Most people on this site had joined recently, and think this is a reddit/fox news "everyone's opinion carries the same weight". I don't; I think If you want to advance a position, you have to give some support. Non was given.
Let's start again. Do you think the claims in the post I replied to have any merit? I don't. Do you have any examples we can discuss, since you clearly disagree the ones I brought up are relevant?
It is completely devoid of any data - just assertions that are completely false in the world I live in.
> If your best interpretation of "innovation" is "web standards," it is clear that we have VERY different perspectives on modern computing.
Well, in HN the standard topic of "MS stalling" is IE, so I assumed that.
> Please consider the tone of your posting.
Yes, it was a bit aggressive. I've been on HN since the time when a demand for facts or at the very least items that could be discussed (rather than vague notions) was the norm. Most people on this site had joined recently, and think this is a reddit/fox news "everyone's opinion carries the same weight". I don't; I think If you want to advance a position, you have to give some support. Non was given.
Let's start again. Do you think the claims in the post I replied to have any merit? I don't. Do you have any examples we can discuss, since you clearly disagree the ones I brought up are relevant?