Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> most of the company is owned by someone else.

Absolutely correct, but…

> He has a majority of the voting stock, and presumably so will his heir.

Which is what counts, in terms of being able to push through his ideas of where/how the company should (try to) move.



This also highlights an extreme imbalance between ability to do great harm and bearing the brunt of said harm.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: