> Usually when I read things that I disagree with it doesn't really prod at me ... I saw nothing in that article as to /why/ google might have done what they did
And then from the article:
"""
but enough people finally cornered them and got them to admit it was about the cost.
"""
From what I see, you really didn't read the article.
No, it's not "of course it's because of the cost" because it could have been for another reason, and (thank God) the article wasn't about why Google would cut back on a perk. If it was, I wouldn't have read it.
And then from the article:
""" but enough people finally cornered them and got them to admit it was about the cost. """
From what I see, you really didn't read the article.