Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> why not just have (snip) one LED that's turned on/off?

I used to have a camera with a battery charger that only had one LED that was turned on/off. The problem with that particular solution to the red/green charge indicator is that you don't necessarily know if it's off because it's fully charged, or off because it's not plugged in correctly or there's no power, and I got burned a few times this way. So to have two separate labelled LEDs would be a nicer solution, one for power and one for whether or not it was charging.



My previous camera had the one LED that was on/off and I never had a problem with it. When I first plugged it in I would insure that the light was on and then I'd just leave it alone until the light was off. I tend to charge my batteries though in an area of the room where it won't be disturbed and likely to accidently get unplugged or whatever.

I see your point but I'd still prefer one LED that was on/off than the LED that's red/green which I can't tell the difference between at all. They just had to use the two colors that make up the most common form of color blindness . . .


Ah yeah. If it's worth noting, that charger of mine was in two pieces: the charger, and the power cable. The latter went behind my desk, and once in a while it would get dislodged. The LED would never come on if the battery were charged, but I had two batteries and never kept track of what to charge, and it took effort to seat the battery correctly...it was horrible.

I guess the red/green LEDs is just because those colors are fairly logical, although pretty stupid for colorblind people. My current camera has only one LED going red/green as well, and Apple's laptop chargers have always had some sort of light for that too (although, more than one way to tell if something was charged or not).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: