Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is so good - unlike seemingly everything else I read in "The New Yorker" which is usually so much verbose low-signal drivel.

I want to learn about the new cancer breakthrough, not read 5 paragraphs about what the scientist's office looked like in self-satisfied "prose" only to set the stage for a meandering intro and finally finishing with a few sentences of actual information - often misrepresented by the author's lack of understanding for the science involved.



Reading the New Yorker for science is like reading The Economist for sports.


It's the same for politics, etc. I also don't want to hear about what their office looks like, etc.


journalists are the worst!


Do you have a scientific source for your claim?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: