Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Indeed, it's a compromise. Something I can't figure out though is if you make any attempt to remove unnecessary nix packages for the final image, i.e. in cases where a (language-)package has a native module built from source, can you generate a final image without gcc present?

There are a couple of sneaky ways this could possibly be done, but wondered if you explored any of them.



I don’t think we are ATM but would absolutely love a PR/suggestion for this!

Would love to drop image sizes


Having just written up some thoughts on how you could do it I realize they wouldn't work, because I imagine you're presenting a "standard"/FHS-esque view of the filesystem to the non-nix packages, i.e. they expect a `/usr/lib/libssl.so` to exist. Whereas Nix's ability to strip away runtime-unnecessary packages comes from packages only ever using explicit absolute references to each other.

I guess a "third way" might involve using e.g. pypi2nix, bundix, node2nix and the like.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: