Using NixOS as a personal desktop for doing development can take a lot of work. You can expect it to take more work than just making the same setup in Arch linux, or whatever.
My experience with Nix is that it's 95% wonderful, 5% very painful. -- Navigating the painful parts of Nix requires understanding what's going on with the Linux parts, with the Nix parts, and with the parts of whatever you're trying to do. (Whereas with other OSs, you can generally get by with copy-pasting from StackOverflow).
Especially given that Nix requires use of a pure functional language, and that there are few tools developers are willing to put effort in to learn, Nix really stands out as unfamiliar.
> My experience with Nix is that it's 95% wonderful, 5% very painful.
This is very true. Having used NixOS as my main OS for 5 or 6 years now, the encouraging thing is that the '95%', the 'happy path' is growing all the time. It'll never be 100%, but more and more people will find that Nix's 95% covers 100% of their own use cases. (This is especially true as Flatpak matures and gains popularity, making it more and more useful as an escape hatch for running oddball software that Nixpkgs contributors haven't had a chance to wrangle yet.)
Using NixOS as a personal desktop for doing development can take a lot of work. You can expect it to take more work than just making the same setup in Arch linux, or whatever.
My experience with Nix is that it's 95% wonderful, 5% very painful. -- Navigating the painful parts of Nix requires understanding what's going on with the Linux parts, with the Nix parts, and with the parts of whatever you're trying to do. (Whereas with other OSs, you can generally get by with copy-pasting from StackOverflow).
Especially given that Nix requires use of a pure functional language, and that there are few tools developers are willing to put effort in to learn, Nix really stands out as unfamiliar.