Thanks for responding. It's helpful to understand exactly the argument some people are making. Would it be fair to characterize your rebuttal as "Because I'm a counter example, the article's conclusions are wrong"?
No I meant because I'm a counter example my point of view is that article's conclusions are wrong that's just my opinion.
I think they are using stereotypes in order to mark some people as Covid non-compliers.
I'm not a psychiatrist or a scientist therefore I'm not qualified to review and assert this article(paper) which is referring to scientific research study in psychology.
This could be a good opportunity to dig into what statistical reasoning is and how it works. Having additional ways to examine and critique arguments is a powerful tool.
