> That's not correct. In C++, the type of a character literal is simply char, never signed char nor unsigned char.
I'd assume the author meant (signed `char` | unsigned `char`) rather than (`signed char` | `unsigned char`).
> That's not correct. In C++, the type of a character literal is simply char, never signed char nor unsigned char.
I'd assume the author meant (signed `char` | unsigned `char`) rather than (`signed char` | `unsigned char`).