Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I just put up a few stills of my own restorations, some short demo videos, and Github repositories for the interface board and the software. I had no idea anyone would want to watch four hours of Teletype repair videos.

Model 15 and 19 Teletypes are not hard to work on. Everything comes apart easily; it's all screws and lockwashers. They're human scale; it's not like building surface mount electronics or repairing an iPhone, where you work under a microscope. The adjustments aren't that finicky, except for a few near the selector magnet. It also helps that the whole thing is unidirectional - there's a straightforward path from input signal to typebar hitting the paper, and you can work through problems in order. As a nice feature, movement is powered in one direction and spring-loaded in the other, so if something gets stuck, it's just stuck in the operated position and doesn't get bent or broken.

Aircraft are built like that. Some parts require careful adjustment, but there's almost always an easy way to check that you got it right. Because, after all, you can't fix it in flight.

Mechanical design has a design philosophy embedded in it. If you work on complex mechanical systems, you can sometimes get a feel for how the original designer thought. Good machinery design is not a common skill. All the good Teletypes were designed by only two people - Howard Krum and Ed Kleinschmidt.

Very few people study this any more in the US, which hurts when you need to design production machinery.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: