The example there is:

Tom: All cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. Therefore, Ginger is a cat.

Bill: You have just fallaciously affirmed the consequent. You are incorrect. Therefore, Ginger is not a cat.

> Logician: Here is an example of a syllogism. The cat has four paws. Isidore and Fricot both have four paws. Therefore Isidore and Fricot are cats.

> Old Gentleman: My dog has got four paws.

> Logician: Then it is a cat.

> ...

> Logician: Another syllogism. All cats die. Socrates is dead. Therefore Socrates is a cat.

> Old Gentleman: And he's got four paws. That's true. I've got a cat named Socrates.

> Logician: There you are, you see...

> Old Gentleman: So Socrates was a cat, was he?

> Logician: Logic has just revealed the fact to us.

Substitute "data" for logic in this context I guess

- 5h sleep - 60% injury likelihood

- 6h sleep - 75% injury likelihood

Now maintain the conclusion that the graph supports the idea of the likelihood of injury being higher the fewer the hours slept per night. Of course such manipulation will not make your book a bestseller.

Studies [0] show that the likelihood of your science being bunk increases with your desire to turn them into bestsellers and make more money from them.

[0] Too lazy to manipulate a bar chart to show whatever I want it to show because I don't actually aim to turn this comment into a bestseller.