I am mad when a brand is obviously and garishly inserted into a movie in a way that breaks my suspension of disbelief. I am not mad when it adds to the suspension of disbelief by making the setting seem more real. Product placement is obviously banned on the BBC, and it seems totally ridiculous when characters in soaps/sitcoms only ever ask for 'beer' or 'wine' in the pub.
The second case is an artistic choice as well as a marketing choice, unlike the blatant mentioning of product names in dialogue that is so annoying. This corresponds to my point about social interaction solely for profit being the problem.
Similarly, my friend who likes certain music spams my feed with links because he likes me and because he wants me to share the enjoyment he derives from the music he's found. He may also want to increase the income of the band, but that isn't the only reason he puts the links there. I have other friends who are in bands or promote bands, and it does sometimes annoy me when they spam my feed.
I might be mad if a chess robot brought up a product, it would likely depend on how well it blended into the conversation in a similar way to how my attitude to movie product placements varies with how well they blend into the movie.
It would also depend on how good the robot was as a chess partner compared to other robots that namedrop products more/less. If it outshines every product on the market I might put up with a lot of marketing. By then we'll probably have adblock for our implant firmware anyway.
Yes, that's my point: as robots become more human, their activities will "blend in", as you say, with the things we normally do with folks. Right now it's much too jarring.
Don't get me wrong -- I'm not rooting for the robots. Far from it. I don't want to live in a world where we are all networked together and have armies of little robot friends to help us with all of our needs. Yuck.
I was getting more to the true nature of the Turing Test. If you can't tell whether there's a person or robot talking on the other end, it really doesn't matter. In fact, you could argue that, for our own personal needs, internet bots could end up becoming much better "people" than real people. Which is very strange.
The second case is an artistic choice as well as a marketing choice, unlike the blatant mentioning of product names in dialogue that is so annoying. This corresponds to my point about social interaction solely for profit being the problem.
Similarly, my friend who likes certain music spams my feed with links because he likes me and because he wants me to share the enjoyment he derives from the music he's found. He may also want to increase the income of the band, but that isn't the only reason he puts the links there. I have other friends who are in bands or promote bands, and it does sometimes annoy me when they spam my feed.
I might be mad if a chess robot brought up a product, it would likely depend on how well it blended into the conversation in a similar way to how my attitude to movie product placements varies with how well they blend into the movie.
It would also depend on how good the robot was as a chess partner compared to other robots that namedrop products more/less. If it outshines every product on the market I might put up with a lot of marketing. By then we'll probably have adblock for our implant firmware anyway.