Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've been using the web on mobile connections ever since I got my first iPhone in 2008.

When you say that it was unusable, surely it's hyperbole.

I might be in a minority maybe, but I never had a problem with it and I've been a heavy user. And especially now that 4G connections are everywhere and smartphones are overpowered.

I mean I watch HD videos on the web while riding the city bus with no interruptions.

Are you telling me that a phone with better performance than the desktop I had 10 years ago, with a 4G connection able to stream hundreds of MB of data on a moving bus isn't capable of loading freaking text content without AMP?

Surely something is missing from this picture. I'm replying to you on Hacker News by loading the website in my browser, no AMP in sight. And I read HN, including all websites listed on HN, from my phone with no AMP.

And sure some websites can take a second or two to load due to crappy ads mostly. I remember a time when I waited for 5 minutes to load a website, when all we had was dial-up. And even that was awesome ;-)

N.b. I avoid AMP on purpose. I started using DuckDuckGo on my mobile to avoid AMP, as I had no other way to turn that shit it off.



Iphone was one of the more expensive phones you could get in 2008, just like it is now. You were not browsing the Web on the "slow android phones" parent was taking about.

HN is an exceptionally fast website and not representative of the Web at large.

Compare HN to something like reddit, a website which provides very similar functionality but is an order of magnitude slower. Then ask yourself why reddit has to be so slow.


The Reddit website is working perfectly fine for my purposes. The only thing I'm bothered with are the annoying popups suggesting to try their app.

Also if Reddit is slower than HN, that's probably because they don't care (law of diminishing returns ftw) and I'm sure they'd rather drive people to their mobile app instead. All of this isn't the fault of the web technologies used and neglect can't be solved by AMP.

AMP puts websites under Google's control and nobody asked for it, being shoved down on people's throats due to an imaginary problem.

---

> You were not browsing the Web on "slow android phones"

Note that even the shitty, stock Android phones today are better than the iPhone that I had back then. Such is the progress of technology.

I know because we have a ton of low cost Android phones to test with.

The only performance problems we encounter are in the third world countries of Africa and possibly in other emerging markets, but that's only a temporary issue and I predict that in another 3-4 years from now it will be a non-issue even in those countries, hardly a reason to give up on our web standards. And it's not like you can't design super lean websites anyway.


> it's not like you can't design super lean websites anyway.

Sure, but people don't.


> I've been using the web on mobile connections ever since I got my first iPhone in 2008.

Okay, great. You had one of the most powerful phones at the time. How was the experience for people with a "feature phone" in 2008? (I'll tell you from experience, it was terrible).

How would the experience be today, with your iPhone from 2008? Terrible. Why? Is the web more powerful as a result? Can you do more things? Nah, it just looks flashier.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: