It's even odds that a study like this won't be replicated[1], so it's not worth much.
I think the GP's only indefensible claim is "none of this is true," the observations the researchers made could all be statistically valid and people may be "seeking social change" by moral grandstanding.
After all, you have a mess of political tribes vying for influence, and the dominant tribe is the one that broadly gets to set the rules.
What's wrong with this study is that what they claim was found is a complete lie. As in it is not true. What I don't like about it is that it is a lie.
So no matter what I'm wrong. See, that's not true, it's just the status quo seeking itself. They lie, and seek to make it impossible to defy. NOTHING NEW.
You're not wrong no matter what. You're wrong because all you're saying is that the study is wrong. Why? What about the study do you object to? You've provided nothing to back up your disagreement, except that you think they're lying. It's just a pretty decent example of social-media-style outrage. honestly.
That doesn't make me wrong. So somebody lies, and saying they lie is impossible ? I don't have to prove you're a liar to call you a liar, otherwise the liar always gets what they want. It's ok to call liars liars without it needing any work whatsoever. It's just a statement of fact, if you choose to believe the liar because they lied and nobody can do the work necessary to change your mind, that's on you. At least you had a chance to hear something besides the lie.
Epstein didn't kill himself. Sorry, I don't have any proof. But they did a study, and lied.
Except in that case you could cite reputable media channel interviews with the qualified experts hired by his family members who were present for the autopsy. You're just making lazy and borderline intellectually dishonest heckles from your keyboard.
