Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I am inherently suspicious of these types of nanny-tech initiatives.

As you should be. It just gives google more excuse to monitor you. They have justification for monitoring you more closely. To "help" you.

It's so funny to me how the HN crowd who attacked google,facebook, etc relentlessly for monitoring their users are now demanding google,facebook,etc monitor their users even more to manipulate their behavior.

What happened to individual responsibility? And why the focus solely on social media? Should ISPs do the same thing? What about 24/7 stores? What about TV? What about news organizations? Should we only allow news organizations to print on odd numbered days to help news junkies?

I know most of the anti-social media rhetoric is just paid propaganda funded by the elites who want control over social media. But I just don't understand the supposedly "independent minded free thinking" liberals on hacker news advocating for nanny-state and nanny-corporations.

Is this hacker news or geriatric news. It seems like most posters on here are bitter 50+ year olds who rail against technology. There is something so eerie and strange about the HN crowd lately. Is it that most HN are just old now?

I would never expected this type of thinking from developers, let alone "hackers" on "hacker" news.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: