That is one of the least usable flowcharts I have ever seen.
Anyone care to knock together a much more readable one that doesn't use a 3d isometric view to not just confuse the read by splitting things over multiple levels, but also to actually obscure the text which is the point of the diagram?
Don't get me wrong - it's a lovely idea, but the execution is...less than optimal.
"Dealing with stuff" (From about 32 min into Bruce's[1] talk)
- Pay most attention to your "common everyday objects". Ie. anything that takes up your immediate space (eg. on your body, in the room with you) or your time
- Buy the best possible common everyday objects you can. Most importantly:
-- your bed: you spend a third of your life in it. Consider per-hour cost
-- your chair: stop whining about your wrists and back hurting and buy a really good chair
- Ditch anything you haven't used in the last 12 months. eg: wedding china, tuxedo, everything in your storage locker
- Only buy real things you will really use
---------
Getting rid of stuff is HARD but doable. Do not start on impulse. Think hard about it and make sure you're morally prepared.
For each item in your life:
1) Is it beautiful?
Test: You have it on display. You share its beauty with the people in your life.
If yes then keep it, otherwise...
2) Is it emotionally important?
Test: It has a narrative. You tell its story to other people.
If yes then keep it, otherwise...
3a) Is it a useful tool, piece of equipment, or appliance?
Test: It efficiently performs some useful function. It actually works. It is the best possible tool. (Do not put up with broken or shoddy stuff)
Note: There's nothing more materialistic than doing the same job 5 times because your tools are inferior.
3b) Are you experimenting on it?
Test: You methodically work on it and you publish your results.
4) It's unworthy of taking your space or time. Virtualize it (take its picture; record the barcode; record any anecdotes about it) then get RID of it. If you ever need it again, get another one from eBay.
Anyone care to knock together a much more readable one that doesn't use a 3d isometric view to not just confuse the read by splitting things over multiple levels, but also to actually obscure the text which is the point of the diagram?
Don't get me wrong - it's a lovely idea, but the execution is...less than optimal.