Yes they do, the cracking scene ethos is all about technical one-upmanship and the thrill and glory of beating copy protection. Or at least it used to be. The really smart ones do it for their own enjoyment or ideological reasons.
As I recall the early virus guys were more like vandals who wanted to cause problems for the thrill of it than guys operating international rackets like they are now. When was the last time you heard of a virus that just formatted your hard drive or whatever?
There are lots of attack vectors, not just pirated software, and viable ones depending on desired outcome can range from email, browser, and direct software spread (pirate games). MacOS isn't safe, and neither is Linux though the attack vectors will vary.
If all you want is a DDoS, a fake advertising account can often deliver the desired effect without actually infecting anyone. It really depends on what the cost/benefit vs desired outcome is. Not everything requires root, and very few people actually check checksums for things they download.
How does this relate to the issue that antivirus companies do horrible things and hold ignorant paying users who don't even know how to pirate software, and legitimate software producers hostage like some sort of technical mafia?
Because they only became a business due to the people that were pirating software in the 80's.
Thanks to the increase of virus across MS-DOS, Atari, Acorn, Amiga and Mac operating systems, specially on boot sector floppies, the general public learned that anti-virus were required software to always have installed.
Yes, it was the spread of pirated software, which crackers usually filled with virus "just for fun", alongside the lack of protection mechanism in the desktop OSes that gave rise to virus.
Thus making anti-virus a software package, that most home users would buy, in my home country even that was usually pirated.