Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I found this part disturbing: "The business-savvy Komisaruk already has taken out a patent on the peptide that creates [post-orgasm bliss]." What an awful thing to do.


According to the article, a portion of his research focuses on lessening pain. The patenting of the peptide would probably be for pain-reduction application (big money in pain meds), rather than creating an orgasm pill.


You seriously don't think there would be money in an orgasm pill?


Isn't there an orgasm-by-wire already?


What does it mean to patent a peptide? I suppose that it doesn't mean that everyone has to pay him to get an orgasm. He didn't patent a process for making the peptide either. So perhaps it's the use of the peptide in other situations than a natural orgasm? If I discover a planet, can I patent the use of the planet?


> I suppose that it doesn't mean that everyone has to pay him to get an orgasm.

I laughed so hard after reading that and thinking of the implications of such a scenario. My gf asked my what happened; I told her someone has patented orgasm bliss. I think she believed me and seemed genuinely concerned about paying someone to get orgasm.


Girlfriend's never been to Vegas, has she?


It might well fail a challenge, like the patent on the BRCA2 cancer gene did.


You'll have a patent war on your hands with the Magratheans.


We'll have to see if/how he uses it. He could simply have patented it to prevent anyone else from doing so and abusing it.


If he publishes and doesn't file a patent, no one can.


Ah, I didn't know that. Though I suppose it makes sense.





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: