I don't see why. There's nothing wrong with being black, unless you're saying there is. Statistically they're a more disadvantaged group because of obvious generational challenges other ethnicities inflicted. Most people are aware of this, and using the term 'white' for the corollary is simple information encoding.
It's not encoding any useful information other than your racist assumptions. The only difference between "privilege" and "white privilege" is a pointless correlation. What extra information can you possibly think it provides besides information about the person that uses it.
Would you be comfortable with saying that someone who is committing a crime is "acting black" because black people have a higher prison enrollment?
It's not encoding any useful information other than your racist assumptions. The only difference between "privilege" and "white privilege" is a pointless correlation. What extra information can you possibly think it provides besides information about the person that uses it.
Would you be comfortable with saying that someone who is committing a crime is "acting black" because black people have a higher prison enrollment?
>'acting black' yes that would be racist, because that's speaking of the individual.
This criteria is nonsense. If you have an asian guy committing a crime and you say he's acting black because he didn't get enough white privilege, both of those components are racist. His crime and his relative privilege level have nothing to do with his skin color.
