Editing what is billed as an archive defeats the purpose of an "archive".

> Editing what is billed as an archive defeats the purpose of an "archive".

No, certain edits are understandable and required. Even the archive.org edits its pages (e.g. sticks banners on them and does a bunch of stuff to make them work like you'd expect).

Even paper archives edit documents (e.g. writing sequence numbers on them, so the ordering doesn't get lost).

Disclosing exactly what account was used to download a particular page is arguably irrelevant information, and may even compromise the work of archiving pages (e.g. if it just opens the account to getting blocked).

Don't be surprised by this, there are a lot more edits than you think. For example, CSS is always inlined so that pages could render the same as it was archived.

CSS inlining happens during the process of archiving, no?

The issue here is to edit archived pages retrospectively.

The relevant part of the page to archive is the content of the page, not the user account that visited the page. Most sane people would consider two archives of the same page with different user accounts at the top, the same page.

A comment above yours clearly explains why:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47034480

I'm fairly certain the radio time signal has a mechanism to convey daylight savings, I've had alarm clocks that managed DST without any input.

> The DST status bits indicate United States daylight saving time rules.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWVB

You're right. I was wrong about that, mostly because I've never had a WWVB clock work for me at all.

Yes

This is awesome, thank you so much for posting it.

I recently went looking for that site since I got into tdarr, and I was sad to see it go. It definitely isn't great for "prod" use, but I find that a GUI listing options makes it easier to understand the thought process behind software.

Kills me that they didn't even bother open sourcing it.

> Google probably has the gear and the global distribution that they could probably keep pretty close over 30-60 days, but they are assuredly not trying to keep their own independent time standard.

Funny you should say that... https://developers.google.com/time/smear

Why are they totally different? For such an old airframe, the only significant costs are fuel and maintenance.

A revamp to the maintenance schedule that requires more frequent engine overhauls absolutely makes the economics of operating 777-200s even less appealing.

Because an attacker would never cover their tracks...

Indeed, being able to trust your audit logs is imperative.

> The bank instantly ruled in my favor and closed the case, issuing a permanent credit. I have never seen that before. They must be getting tons of Comcast chargebacks to do that.

I did the same thing, except I disputed a collections record on my Credit Report from either AT&T or Comcast. They also ruled in my favor quickly, and I was quite surprised that it wasn't a more difficult process.